Tuesday, April 26, 2011

How to fail in real estate



By Marty Douglas
Settle down class. Our topic today is how to fail in the real estate business. It should be on every province’s mandatory education list. For credit. I could write a book but a column will suffice. In no particular order, and you don’t have to do all of these things, any of them will ensure you are a turnover statistic with a short career span.
Nothing sharpens your mind like a pending deadline and just as I despaired for the lack of topics, a faxed contract of purchase and sale arrived on my desk. The good news – it was legible and accepted. The bad news self-inflicted when I wondered how the offer had gone from the buyer to the seller. Was it presented in person by the buyer’s agent or, to use a colloquialism, did they just ‘phone it in’?
One of the obligations of receiving a substantial portion of the commission derived from any real estate transaction is to act as the agent for your client, whether the buyer or the seller. As sellers’ agents we are quite used to presenting offers in person. But as buyers’ agents, due to a combination of geography, sellers’ instructions or availability or – dare I whisper it – bad habits or outright laziness, the evidence is clear that buyers’ reps too often fax or scan the offer to the listing rep and wait for the call. (Okay, there are exceptions – seller’s written instructions, seller in Labrador – but don’t try to tell me it doesn’t happen.)
More than once in my late-night patrols of the office I’ve found a fax that didn’t go through – the line was busy, the area code wrong, the access code forgotten. It was kind of scary when it turned out to be a time sensitive offer sent by an agent who rushed out the door right after hitting the start button.
Pretend you are the buyer on an average priced house (in my community) with a sell side (buyer’s agent) commission of $6,500. Wouldn’t you expect your agent to do battle face to face whenever possible? To answer the question raised by the seller about the offer, the question the seller’s agent can’t answer?
The next rung down the ladder of failure from the faxed offer is the oral offer. “My client will pay $295,000, should I bother writing it up?” Or “See if your buyer will come up another $5,000.” A long time ago – during the era of the statute of frauds – I heard this skilled explanation of how real estate works from a salesperson: “Don’t worry about a verbal offer. We have this special form we fill in and you sign and then we take it to the seller.”
Something requiring very little activity in order to guarantee failure is exactly that – very little activity. Novelist Elmore Leonard could have been describing those cobweb draped shapes in the corner of your office: “They were looking, not for something to do, but for something to happen.” I spent my first six months in real estate waiting for the walk-in traffic. No one told me that going out to find the client was more important than doing something to get the client to call. Yes, you have to advertise but advertising alone leads to an office account with no revenue.
Next – too much preparation. Motivational speaker Rosita Perez said, “A lot of people die – stuck in three to get ready – as in one for the money, two for the show, three to get ready, three to get ready, three to get ready . . .” You have to take the next step. Discussing dance in his novel Valediction, Robert Parker wrote: “Performance is different. You can take classes all your life and rehearse forever, but you make more progress in one performance than you do in a year of lessons. Performance is the real thing. The other stuff is getting ready.”
As an alternative to too much preparation, try winging it. Howard Brinton, sometimes brutally frank in his motivational pep talks, says: “You have to practice and memorize your presentation – the reason a magician can pull a rabbit out of the hat is that he put it there before the show began.”
My favourite trainer in the old Realty World system, Dick Burnham, said: “You would never give an Academy Award to an actor who made up their lines as they went along. Sellers shouldn’t give listings to salespeople who make up the words as they go along.” Insight from Michael Caine: “Actors don’t get paid for the minute or two they spend in front of the cameras. They get paid for the preparation and the waiting around.”
One more characteristic of failures – they have no idea where their business comes from. Mitzi Bryant says: “Knowing where your business comes from allows you to eliminate those activities that aren’t productive.” Think about that as you review the mound of expenses at month end. Is that classified ad you placed in the Moose Jaw Gazette years ago still working?
Failures look for shortcuts. In an old TV series, Police Story, the desk sergeant bellowed: “I’ve been in this business for a lot of years looking for shortcuts. I’ll be the first to let you know if I find one. Meantime, hit the streets and turn over stones.”
E. Bunker Hunt, in amassing his billions, paused to reflect on success: “Success is simple. First you decide what you want in life. Second, you decide if you are willing to pay the price. Then you pay the price.” In The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell’s research indicated the price for success in any chosen venture was about 10,000 hours of practice and timing.
Once achieved, however, success can lead to failure. Success is like a sword – very useful but you can’t sit on it. And it’s not like this is a complicated business or rocket science. Some people who earn a lot of money in real estate are neither bright nor personable – it’s not a requirement. My boss Randy Forbes reminds managers from time to time: “Remind your staff how simple their job is – list property, find people, give them reasons to buy.”
One of the truisms of sales comes from Merle Ace: “Salespeople usually quit a long time before they leave the job.” And that takes us to….
The last word has to be a shot at real estate managers and comes from an old friend in the business, Barry Watchorn: “We are too soft as managers in this business. We spend too much time herding turkeys up and down the runways, hoping they’ll fly.”

Friday, April 15, 2011

Foreign property buyers restrictions needed?

Posted: Apr 11, 2011 10:39 AM PT 

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2011 7:44 PM PT 


A prominent Vancouver businessman and former city councillor says it's time to debate restricting foreign ownership of residential properties as a way to cool down Vancouver's hot real estate market.
Peter Ladner says Vancouver's home prices are out of control, and with China and Australia already restricting foreign ownership, Vancouverites should at least examine whether the idea makes sense.
"Ironically, many of the people driving up the prices are coming here from mainland China where soaring real estate prices have caused the Chinese government to introduce new limits on foreign purchases of residential or commercial property in the country," he wrote in a recent article published in Business in Vancouver.
Ladner says he isn't isn't taking a position on the issue, but he wants a debate. He notes there has been virtually no public research on the level of foreign ownership in Metro Vancouver and its effect.
Former Vancouver city council Peter Ladner ran for mayor in the 2008 civic election but lost to Gregor Robertson.Former Vancouver city council Peter Ladner ran for mayor in the 2008 civic election but lost to Gregor Robertson. CBCBut he says prices are forcing people raised in Metro Vancouver to move elsewhere and preventing others from moving to the area.
"If our prices are being driven up by people who are simply investing in our community and not living here, there are a whole lot of problems that result," Ladner told CBC News.
"You end up with a resort community that is unlivable despite our reputation as one of the most livable cities in the world."
Ladner notes across Canada, that PEI, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta already have various laws in place the restrict the non-residents' rights to buy land.

Vancouver leads with unaffordable housing

Tsur Somerville of the UBC Sauder School of Business says the debate over foreign ownership would be nothing new.
The number of sales was 30 per cent lower and the number of listings was 30 per cent higher in Vancouver in June 2010, compared to June 2009. The number of sales was 30 per cent lower and the number of listings was 30 per cent higher in Vancouver in June 2010, compared to June 2009. CBC"If you go back to the 1980s, and the worry about Hongcouver, and all these kinds of things, Vancouver has been through this story before and I think most people think this city is better off now than it was in 1987," said Somerville.
Vancouver has the highest housing prices in Canada, the greatest price increases, and the world's least affordable housing prices, according to recent figures.
Some of the most rapid price increases around Metro Vancouver have been in Richmond where the price for a detached home has climbed 20 per cent, or about $215,000 over the past year to above the $1-million mark.
Realtor have attributed the rapid price increases to a sudden influx of mainland Chinese buyers, but in recent months many realtors have noted mainland Chinese buyers have been active in many of the region's other more expensive markets, such as the West Side of Vancouver and the North Shore.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Second home and higher education both within reach


Written by DIANNE MALEY - The Globe and Mail
Antonia and Ronaldo have big salaries and big dreams. Ronaldo, 55, has his own communications company. Antonia, 52, works in the medical field. Together they earn $505,000 a year.
In a sense, they are starting over again – both have been married before. They have a one-year-old child. Like so many Canadians, Ronaldo and Antonia have made owning real estate a big part of their retirement plans.
In 2008, they built two houses in Calgary, planning to sell one to pay down the mortgage on the other. But the market weakened and they ended up renting out the second property. Now they’d like to sell it – even at a small loss – and buy a less expensive second property in California or Arizona (in the $400,000 to $450,000 range), which would leave them roughly $300,000 to put against the mortgage on their principal residence. They would use the U.S. rental home for one or two short vacations during the year.
“The objective would be to have the U.S. house pay for itself, or nearly so, and for its value to appreciate in the years ahead,” Antonia writes in an e-mail.
Their financial goals include saving for their child’s higher education, paying off their debts by the time Ronaldo retires in 10 years and saving for retirement. Antonia has a defined-benefit pension plan that will pay $40,835 a year if she stays in the same job until she retires at age 65; Ronaldo must rely on his own savings. They figure they’ll need after-tax income of $120,000 a year.
We asked Ron Graham, financial planner at Ron Graham & Associates Ltd. in Edmonton, to look at Antonia and Ronaldo’s situation.
What the expert says
As it stands, the couple’s income will exceed their expenses by about $10,000 a month once Antonia goes back to work in June after a year’s parental leave, so their goals – which require $9,000 a month – are achievable in theory, Mr. Graham says.
“This may leave them in a tight bind if unanticipated expenses arise,” he notes. In reality, they may have to compromise.
Ronaldo and Antonia want to provide post-graduate education for their child. Mr. Graham assumes this will be six years of postsecondary education, which could cost up to $280,000 by the time the child is finished. They have already saved $4,000 and are adding another $2,520 a year to a registered education savings plan. They are contributing $210 a month to the RESP and getting a grant of $40, for a total of $250 per month. This is not enough. To have enough saved by the time Antonia turns 65, they have to save $950 a month, an increase of $700 a month.
Mr. Graham suggests they continue to contribute enough to the RESP to take full advantage of the federal government’s Canadian Education Savings Grant of 20 per cent of contributions to a maximum of $7,200.
Then they could set up a separate investment account in their names in trust for the child and contribute $300 a month. Antonia could deposit her universal childcare benefit cheques (another $100 a month) as well as any gifts of money the child may receive over the years. The money could be invested in low-cost equity mutual funds, and any capital gains would be taxed in the hands of the child. If these investments earn more than 6 per cent, then they will have enough saved.
Ronaldo will be getting a lump sum payment of $130,000 from the sale of a former business. They should use the money first to catch up on unused contribution room in their registered retirement savings plans (about $66,000), then their tax-free savings accounts ($30,000), and then pay down debt. They should pay off their line of credit, car loan and RRSP loan as soon as possible because personal loans are not tax deductible, the planner notes. The net proceeds of the rental property sale should be used to pay off their line of credit and the balance to pay down the mortgage on their principal residence.
As for the U.S. investment property, buying it would add to their debt load, Mr. Graham notes. If they do decide to buy, they should do so entirely with borrowed money so the interest is deductible against income and make sure they understand all the various tax implications of renting in the United States.
At 65, Ronaldo and Antonia will each get $11,520 from the Canada Pension Plan and $6,292 from Old Age Security. Their savings are now $656,000. If their current investments grow at an average annual rate of 4 per cent, they will have about $971,000 in RRSPs and locked-in retirement accounts when Ronaldo reaches 65, Mr. Graham calculates.
To meet their retirement goals, they will have to save the maximum in their RRSPs ($560,000 more) and their TFSAs ($173,000 more) – plus an additional $680,000 of retirement capital outside of their tax-sheltered plans. Because they are already saving $28,800 a year, they will have to increase their retirement savings by $66,000 a year or $5,500 a month.
CLIENT SITUATION
The People
Antonia, 52, and Ronaldo, 55.
The Problem
Can they sell their Calgary rental property, buy a sunbelt house, save for their child's education, pay off debt and save enough for retirement?
The Plan
Make much larger contributions to Ronaldo's retirement savings, pay down loans, open trust account for child's education. Tread cautiously with U.S. property.
The Payoff
A comfortable life.
_________________
Monthly net income, including $3,600 rental income: $33,863
Assets: Cash $18,000; Antonia's RRSP $295,000; Ronaldo's RRSP $230,000; Antonia's pension $150,000; home $950,000; rental property $950,000; pending business sale proceeds $130,000.
Total: $2.7-million
Monthly disbursements
Ronaldo's work savings plan $600; his RRSP $1,000; child's RESP $210; stock plan $300; Antonia's pension plan $1,225; groceries $1,250; dining out $500; clothing $1,500; medical, dental $100; child care $2,400; tech tools $150; gifts $150; mortgages, taxes $6,715; home insurance $265; utilities $230; telecom $120; maintenance $200; furniture $200; vacations $800; entertainment $200; hobbies $75; fitness $50; children's activities $50; auto loan $915; auto expenses $510; loan payments $600; disability and life insurance $845; donations $175; memberships $600; office expenses $1,200; group insurance $300. Total: $23,435
Liabilities
Mortgages $1.3-million; line of credit $110,000; RRSP loan $7,000; car loan $30,000.
Total: $1.4-million
Special to The Globe and Mail

comscorebeacon